rabbit anti glua2 n terminal Search Results


99
Cell Signaling Technology Inc anti β actin
Anti β Actin, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/beta-Actin+Antibody/pmc03814226-402-19-21
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti β actin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
GenScript corporation rabbit anti-calnexin
Rabbit Anti Calnexin, supplied by GenScript corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/rabbit+anti+human+calnexin+antibody/10__1523_slash_jneurosci__4029___14__2015-51-81-83
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti-calnexin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit anti biotin
Rabbit Anti Biotin, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/Anti-biotin+Rabbit+mAb/bio_rxiv__2025__02__08__637220-366-15-17
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti biotin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Synaptic Systems arc arg3 1
Arc Arg3 1, supplied by Synaptic Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/156+003/pmc06621478-317-11-12
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
arc arg3 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Alomone Labs anti glun2b n
Anti Glun2b N, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/Anti-NMDAR2B+(GluN2B)+(extracellular)+Antibody/pmc04469732-132-9-12
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti glun2b n - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Cell Signaling Technology Inc atg101
a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, <t>Atg101,</t> Atg13, FIP200 and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).
Atg101, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/Atg101+Rabbit+mAb/pmc08814153-536-27-29
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
atg101 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

95
Cell Signaling Technology Inc fip200
a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, <t>FIP200</t> and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).
Fip200, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/FIP200+Rabbit+mAb/pmc08814153-536-22-24
Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fip200 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
95/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
NeuroMab mouse psd 95
a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, <t>FIP200</t> and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).
Mouse Psd 95, supplied by NeuroMab, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/Anti-PSD-95+Antibody/pmc03929687-109-43-47
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse psd 95 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
NeuroMab mouse anti sap97
a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, <t>FIP200</t> and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).
Mouse Anti Sap97, supplied by NeuroMab, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/Anti-SAP97+Antibody/pmc04469732-132-68-72
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
mouse anti sap97 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Proteintech anti tom20
a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, <t>FIP200</t> and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).
Anti Tom20, supplied by Proteintech, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/TOM20+Antibody/pmc10943477-360-31-32
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti tom20 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
Cell Signaling Technology Inc rabbit gsk 3β
a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, <t>FIP200</t> and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).
Rabbit Gsk 3β, supplied by Cell Signaling Technology Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/GSK-3beta+Rabbit+mAb/pmc03929687-262-8-10
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit gsk 3β - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

94
Alomone Labs rabbit anti glun2a
a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, <t>FIP200</t> and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).
Rabbit Anti Glun2a, supplied by Alomone Labs, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/rabbit+anti+glua2+n+terminal/Anti-NMDAR2A+(GluN2A)+(extracellular)+Antibody/pmc04469732-132-15-12
Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
rabbit anti glun2a - by Bioz Stars, 2026-10
94/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, FIP200 and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Dendritic autophagy degrades postsynaptic proteins and is required for long-term synaptic depression in mice

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28301-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, FIP200 and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were: LC3 (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-376404 and Sigma, L7543), Atg13 (1:1000, Sigma–Aldrich, SAB4200100), MAP2 (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #188004), FIP200 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #12436), Atg101 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #13492), ULK1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #8054), p62 (1:2000, Calbiochem, DR1057), WIPI2 (1:1000, Abcam, ab105459), GluA2 (N-terminus, 1:1000, Alomone, AGP-073), PSD95 (1:1000, Invitrogen, MA1-046) and Arc (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #156003).

Techniques: Super-Resolution Microscopy, Labeling, Control, Immunolabeling, Comparison, Western Blot

a – e Representative confocal images of the CA1 stratum radiatum area of wild-type P22-P28 hippocampal slices (as shown in the schematic representation), immunolabeled with antibodies against a Arc, b ULK1, c Atg101, d Atg13, and e FIP200 along with MAP2. Immuno-labeling was performed in slices under control conditions or 15 min after chemical NMDAR- or mGluR-LTD. Scale bars: 50 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component, normalized to MAP2. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 32.10, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9906). Atg101: F(2,15) = 32.92, P < 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8920). Atg13: F(2,15) = 17.88, P = 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0006, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8267). FIP200: F(2,15) = 16.91, P = 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR = 0.0003, P control_mGluR = 0.0006, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9247). f Representative electron micrographs of neurobiotin-labeled dendrites of pyramidal neurons in the CA1 stratum radiatum area in hippocampal slices under control conditions and 15 min or 1 h after LTD induction by LFS. Black arrows indicate the labeled dendritic spines. Note the presence of multiple autophagic vesicles in the dendritic shaft near the neck of the spines (asterisks). Bottom panels show characteristic double-membrane-bound autophagic vesicles at higher magnification and the presence of vesicle-like structures inside dendritic spines. Scale bars: 500 nm (white bars), 200 nm (black bars). ( N = 6 animals per condition). g Graph showing the percentage of labeled postsynaptic dendrites containing phagophores in control condition or 15 min after LFS and in the presence or absence of Ciliobrevin-D (25 μM), bath applied for 2 h prior, during and after LFS. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 animals per condition, n = 48 dendrites per condition. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA, F(2,15) = 41.99, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_LFS < 0.0001, P LFS_LFS/CBD = 0.9574, P control_LFS/CBD < 0.0001). h Graph showing the density of autophagic vesicles in postsynaptic labeled dendrites under control conditions and 1 h after LFS-induced LTD with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. n = 34 dendrites per condition from N = 6 animals. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann–Whitney U test, comparing the LFS condition with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D to control (P control_LTD < 0.0001; P control_LTD/CBD < 0.0001; P LTD_LTD/CBD = 0.0209). i Graph showing the size distribution of autophagic vesicles in postsynaptic labeled dendrites 1 h after LFS-induced LTD with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 89 autophagic vesicles. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann–Whitney U test ( P = 0.2648).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Dendritic autophagy degrades postsynaptic proteins and is required for long-term synaptic depression in mice

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28301-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a – e Representative confocal images of the CA1 stratum radiatum area of wild-type P22-P28 hippocampal slices (as shown in the schematic representation), immunolabeled with antibodies against a Arc, b ULK1, c Atg101, d Atg13, and e FIP200 along with MAP2. Immuno-labeling was performed in slices under control conditions or 15 min after chemical NMDAR- or mGluR-LTD. Scale bars: 50 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component, normalized to MAP2. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 32.10, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9906). Atg101: F(2,15) = 32.92, P < 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8920). Atg13: F(2,15) = 17.88, P = 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0006, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8267). FIP200: F(2,15) = 16.91, P = 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR = 0.0003, P control_mGluR = 0.0006, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9247). f Representative electron micrographs of neurobiotin-labeled dendrites of pyramidal neurons in the CA1 stratum radiatum area in hippocampal slices under control conditions and 15 min or 1 h after LTD induction by LFS. Black arrows indicate the labeled dendritic spines. Note the presence of multiple autophagic vesicles in the dendritic shaft near the neck of the spines (asterisks). Bottom panels show characteristic double-membrane-bound autophagic vesicles at higher magnification and the presence of vesicle-like structures inside dendritic spines. Scale bars: 500 nm (white bars), 200 nm (black bars). ( N = 6 animals per condition). g Graph showing the percentage of labeled postsynaptic dendrites containing phagophores in control condition or 15 min after LFS and in the presence or absence of Ciliobrevin-D (25 μM), bath applied for 2 h prior, during and after LFS. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 animals per condition, n = 48 dendrites per condition. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA, F(2,15) = 41.99, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_LFS < 0.0001, P LFS_LFS/CBD = 0.9574, P control_LFS/CBD < 0.0001). h Graph showing the density of autophagic vesicles in postsynaptic labeled dendrites under control conditions and 1 h after LFS-induced LTD with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. n = 34 dendrites per condition from N = 6 animals. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann–Whitney U test, comparing the LFS condition with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D to control (P control_LTD < 0.0001; P control_LTD/CBD < 0.0001; P LTD_LTD/CBD = 0.0209). i Graph showing the size distribution of autophagic vesicles in postsynaptic labeled dendrites 1 h after LFS-induced LTD with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 89 autophagic vesicles. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann–Whitney U test ( P = 0.2648).

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were: LC3 (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-376404 and Sigma, L7543), Atg13 (1:1000, Sigma–Aldrich, SAB4200100), MAP2 (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #188004), FIP200 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #12436), Atg101 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #13492), ULK1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #8054), p62 (1:2000, Calbiochem, DR1057), WIPI2 (1:1000, Abcam, ab105459), GluA2 (N-terminus, 1:1000, Alomone, AGP-073), PSD95 (1:1000, Invitrogen, MA1-046) and Arc (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #156003).

Techniques: Immunolabeling, Control, Comparison, Labeling, Membrane, MANN-WHITNEY

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Dendritic autophagy degrades postsynaptic proteins and is required for long-term synaptic depression in mice

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28301-z

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were: LC3 (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-376404 and Sigma, L7543), Atg13 (1:1000, Sigma–Aldrich, SAB4200100), MAP2 (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #188004), FIP200 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #12436), Atg101 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #13492), ULK1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #8054), p62 (1:2000, Calbiochem, DR1057), WIPI2 (1:1000, Abcam, ab105459), GluA2 (N-terminus, 1:1000, Alomone, AGP-073), PSD95 (1:1000, Invitrogen, MA1-046) and Arc (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #156003).

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Activity Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Avidin-Biotin Assay, Control, Virus, Infection, In Vivo

a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, FIP200 and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Dendritic autophagy degrades postsynaptic proteins and is required for long-term synaptic depression in mice

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28301-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a Top, representative super-resolution microscopy dSTORM image of a secondary dendrite labeled with an antibody against LC3, 15 min after cLTD. Bottom, magnification of representative U-shaped LC3-positive structures in dendrites, 15 min after NMDA or DHPG pulses. Scale bars: 2 μm and 250 nm, as indicated. ( N = 3 independent experiments). b Graph showing the number of LC3-positive U-shaped structures in secondary dendrites visualized in (a), before (control) and 15 min or 60 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments per condition ( n > 9 dendrites per condition). Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA. For the time point of 15 min F(2, 33) = 17.93, p < 0.0001) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA < 0.0001, P control-DHPG < 0.0001). For the time point of 60 min F(2, 21) = 9.459, p = 0.0012) (Tukey’s test P control-NMDA = 0.0041, P control-DHPG = 0.0024). c Graph showing the size distribution (nm) of the dendritic U-shaped LC3-positive structures visualized in a upon NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Bars represent mean values ± SEM for each analysed dendrite. N = 3 independent experiments (n > 40 dendrites per condition). d , Confocal images of dendrites immunolabeled with antibodies against WIPI2, LC3, and MAP2 before (control) or after 15 min of NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Scale bar: 10 μm. ( N = 6 independent experiments). e , Representative confocal images of neurons immunolabeled with antibodies against ULK1, Atg101, Atg13, FIP200 and, along with MAP2 to label dendrites before (control) or 15 min after LTD-inducing pulses. Scale bar: 20 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component in secondary dendrites, normalized for dendrite length, in every condition, as indicated. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 24.48, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8825). Atg101: F(2,15) = 24.31, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9329). Atg13: F(2,15) = 8.386, P = 0.0036 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.007, P control_mGluR = 0.0086, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9940). FIP200: F(2,15) = 17.66, P = 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test, P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0009, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.6440). f Western blot analyses for Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101, LC3, and β-III tubulin (Tuj1) in neuronal lysates, under control conditions and 15 min after NMDAR- and mGluR-LTD. Graphs showing the normalized protein levels of Atg13, FIP200, ULK1, Atg101 under the aforementioned conditions. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 3 independent experiments for ULK1 complex proteins, N = 5 independent experiments for LC3-II. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,6) = 13.57, P = 0.0059 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0056, P control_DHPG = 0.0253). Atg101: F(2,6) = 27.57, P = 0.0009 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0013, P control_DHPG = 0.79). Atg13: F(2,6) = 113.1, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0027, P control_DHPG < 0.0001). FIP200: F(2,6) = 15.14, P = 0.0045 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0240, P control_DHPG = 0.041). LC3-II: F (2, 12) = 4,969, P = 0.0268 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDA = 0.0478, P control_DHPG = 0.0421).

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were: LC3 (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-376404 and Sigma, L7543), Atg13 (1:1000, Sigma–Aldrich, SAB4200100), MAP2 (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #188004), FIP200 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #12436), Atg101 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #13492), ULK1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #8054), p62 (1:2000, Calbiochem, DR1057), WIPI2 (1:1000, Abcam, ab105459), GluA2 (N-terminus, 1:1000, Alomone, AGP-073), PSD95 (1:1000, Invitrogen, MA1-046) and Arc (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #156003).

Techniques: Super-Resolution Microscopy, Labeling, Control, Immunolabeling, Comparison, Western Blot

a – e Representative confocal images of the CA1 stratum radiatum area of wild-type P22-P28 hippocampal slices (as shown in the schematic representation), immunolabeled with antibodies against a Arc, b ULK1, c Atg101, d Atg13, and e FIP200 along with MAP2. Immuno-labeling was performed in slices under control conditions or 15 min after chemical NMDAR- or mGluR-LTD. Scale bars: 50 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component, normalized to MAP2. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 32.10, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9906). Atg101: F(2,15) = 32.92, P < 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8920). Atg13: F(2,15) = 17.88, P = 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0006, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8267). FIP200: F(2,15) = 16.91, P = 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR = 0.0003, P control_mGluR = 0.0006, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9247). f Representative electron micrographs of neurobiotin-labeled dendrites of pyramidal neurons in the CA1 stratum radiatum area in hippocampal slices under control conditions and 15 min or 1 h after LTD induction by LFS. Black arrows indicate the labeled dendritic spines. Note the presence of multiple autophagic vesicles in the dendritic shaft near the neck of the spines (asterisks). Bottom panels show characteristic double-membrane-bound autophagic vesicles at higher magnification and the presence of vesicle-like structures inside dendritic spines. Scale bars: 500 nm (white bars), 200 nm (black bars). ( N = 6 animals per condition). g Graph showing the percentage of labeled postsynaptic dendrites containing phagophores in control condition or 15 min after LFS and in the presence or absence of Ciliobrevin-D (25 μM), bath applied for 2 h prior, during and after LFS. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 animals per condition, n = 48 dendrites per condition. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA, F(2,15) = 41.99, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_LFS < 0.0001, P LFS_LFS/CBD = 0.9574, P control_LFS/CBD < 0.0001). h Graph showing the density of autophagic vesicles in postsynaptic labeled dendrites under control conditions and 1 h after LFS-induced LTD with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. n = 34 dendrites per condition from N = 6 animals. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann–Whitney U test, comparing the LFS condition with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D to control (P control_LTD < 0.0001; P control_LTD/CBD < 0.0001; P LTD_LTD/CBD = 0.0209). i Graph showing the size distribution of autophagic vesicles in postsynaptic labeled dendrites 1 h after LFS-induced LTD with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 89 autophagic vesicles. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann–Whitney U test ( P = 0.2648).

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Dendritic autophagy degrades postsynaptic proteins and is required for long-term synaptic depression in mice

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28301-z

Figure Lengend Snippet: a – e Representative confocal images of the CA1 stratum radiatum area of wild-type P22-P28 hippocampal slices (as shown in the schematic representation), immunolabeled with antibodies against a Arc, b ULK1, c Atg101, d Atg13, and e FIP200 along with MAP2. Immuno-labeling was performed in slices under control conditions or 15 min after chemical NMDAR- or mGluR-LTD. Scale bars: 50 μm. Graphs showing the number of puncta positive for each ULK1-complex component, normalized to MAP2. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 independent experiments per condition. Statistical analyses were performed using one-way ANOVA. ULK1: F(2,15) = 32.10, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9906). Atg101: F(2,15) = 32.92, P < 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR < 0.0001, P control_mGluR < 0.0001, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8920). Atg13: F(2,15) = 17.88, P = 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR = 0.0002, P control_mGluR = 0.0006, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.8267). FIP200: F(2,15) = 16.91, P = 0.0001 (P control_NMDAR = 0.0003, P control_mGluR = 0.0006, P NMDAR_mGluR = 0.9247). f Representative electron micrographs of neurobiotin-labeled dendrites of pyramidal neurons in the CA1 stratum radiatum area in hippocampal slices under control conditions and 15 min or 1 h after LTD induction by LFS. Black arrows indicate the labeled dendritic spines. Note the presence of multiple autophagic vesicles in the dendritic shaft near the neck of the spines (asterisks). Bottom panels show characteristic double-membrane-bound autophagic vesicles at higher magnification and the presence of vesicle-like structures inside dendritic spines. Scale bars: 500 nm (white bars), 200 nm (black bars). ( N = 6 animals per condition). g Graph showing the percentage of labeled postsynaptic dendrites containing phagophores in control condition or 15 min after LFS and in the presence or absence of Ciliobrevin-D (25 μM), bath applied for 2 h prior, during and after LFS. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 6 animals per condition, n = 48 dendrites per condition. Statistical analyses were performed by one-way ANOVA, F(2,15) = 41.99, P < 0.0001 (Tukey’s multiple comparison test P control_LFS < 0.0001, P LFS_LFS/CBD = 0.9574, P control_LFS/CBD < 0.0001). h Graph showing the density of autophagic vesicles in postsynaptic labeled dendrites under control conditions and 1 h after LFS-induced LTD with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D. Graph bars represent mean values ± SEM. n = 34 dendrites per condition from N = 6 animals. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann–Whitney U test, comparing the LFS condition with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D to control (P control_LTD < 0.0001; P control_LTD/CBD < 0.0001; P LTD_LTD/CBD = 0.0209). i Graph showing the size distribution of autophagic vesicles in postsynaptic labeled dendrites 1 h after LFS-induced LTD with or without bath application of Ciliobrevin-D. Bars represent mean values ± SEM. N = 89 autophagic vesicles. Statistical analyses were performed using Mann–Whitney U test ( P = 0.2648).

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were: LC3 (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-376404 and Sigma, L7543), Atg13 (1:1000, Sigma–Aldrich, SAB4200100), MAP2 (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #188004), FIP200 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #12436), Atg101 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #13492), ULK1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #8054), p62 (1:2000, Calbiochem, DR1057), WIPI2 (1:1000, Abcam, ab105459), GluA2 (N-terminus, 1:1000, Alomone, AGP-073), PSD95 (1:1000, Invitrogen, MA1-046) and Arc (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #156003).

Techniques: Immunolabeling, Control, Comparison, Labeling, Membrane, MANN-WHITNEY

Journal: Nature Communications

Article Title: Dendritic autophagy degrades postsynaptic proteins and is required for long-term synaptic depression in mice

doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-28301-z

Figure Lengend Snippet:

Article Snippet: The primary antibodies used were: LC3 (1:1000, Santa Cruz, sc-376404 and Sigma, L7543), Atg13 (1:1000, Sigma–Aldrich, SAB4200100), MAP2 (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #188004), FIP200 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #12436), Atg101 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #13492), ULK1 (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #8054), p62 (1:2000, Calbiochem, DR1057), WIPI2 (1:1000, Abcam, ab105459), GluA2 (N-terminus, 1:1000, Alomone, AGP-073), PSD95 (1:1000, Invitrogen, MA1-046) and Arc (1:1000, Synaptic Systems, #156003).

Techniques: Concentration Assay, Activity Assay, Plasmid Preparation, Avidin-Biotin Assay, Control, Virus, Infection, In Vivo